Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab (2024)

  • Journal List
  • J Anat
  • v.212(2); 2008 Feb
  • PMC2408980

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab (1)

Link to Publisher's site

J Anat. 2008 Feb; 212(2): 144–152.

PMCID: PMC2408980

PMID: 18194205

T C Crook,1 S E Cruickshank,1 C M McGowan,2 N Stubbs,2 J M Wakeling,1 A M Wilson,1 and R C Payne1

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

The Quarter Horse (bred for acceleration) and the Arab (bred for endurance) are situated at either end of the equine athletic spectrum. Studies into the form and function of the leg muscles in human sprint and endurance runners have demonstrated that differences exist in their muscle architecture. It is not known whether similar differences exist in the horse. Six Quarter Horse and six Arab fresh hind limb cadavers were dissected to gain information on the muscle mass and architecture of the following muscles: gluteus medius; biceps femoris; semitendinosus; vastus lateralis; gastrocnemius; tibialis cranialis and extensor digitorum longus. Specifically, muscle mass, fascicle length and pennation angle were quantified and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) and maximum isometric force were estimated. The hind limb muscles of the Quarter Horse were of a significantly greater mass, but had similar fascicle lengths and pennation angles when compared with those of the Arab; this resulted in the Quarter Horse hind limb muscles having greater PCSAs and hence greater isometric force potential. This study suggests that Quarter Horses as a breed inherently possess large strong hind limb muscles, with the potential to accelerate their body mass more rapidly than those of the Arab.

Keywords: Arab, architecture, biomechanics, equine, locomotion, muscle, Quarter Horse

Introduction

The horse is an exceptional athlete, capable of sprinting rapidly over short distances whilst maintaining the ability to travel great distances at slower speeds. Selective breeding for performance has resulted in distinct breeds of horse which excel at different equine disciplines, such as the Quarter Horse (bred for acceleration) and the Arab (bred for endurance).

In Quarter Horse racing, race times of 21 s for a quarter of a mile (402 m) have been recorded. The horse, accelerating from a standing start, achieved a mean speed of approximately 70 km h−1 (‘A Long Goodbye’; AQHA, 2005), whereas Arab horses in endurance racing travel at a much slower speed of 17 km h−1 covering 160 km in 9.5 h (‘Xandu Haji Buba’; ). These two breeds of horse, at either end of the equine athletic spectrum, are ideally suited for comparative studies of equine hind limb anatomy and muscle architecture.

Research has suggested that the anatomy, and in particular the muscle architecture of the fore and hind limbs of the horse, are optimized for biomechanically distinct functions (Payne et al. 2004, 2005). The proximal muscles of the horse's hind limb provide the power required for locomotion (Merkens et al. 1993; Dutto et al. 2004b), whilst the forelimbs act as stiff spring-like struts () and support a greater proportion of the body mass (Witte et al. 2004).

Equine hind limb anatomy

The proximal hind limb muscles, many of which attach directly to the skeleton without a tendon (Payne et al. 2005), account for the majority of the horse's locomotor mass (Gunn, 1987; Payne et al. 2005). Anatomical, biomechanical and electromyographic studies indicate that these muscles provide the mechanical power output for activities which require net external work, such as acceleration, running uphill and jumping (Robert et al. 2000; Clayton et al. 2002; Dutto et al. 2004a).

The distal hind limb muscles, small in comparison, attach to the skeleton via long thin spring-like tendons, an adaptation in cursorial animals which reduces the need for energetically expensive muscle length change (Dimery et al. 1986). Further information regarding the locomotor anatomy, origin, insertion and action of the muscles that were studied can be found in Fig. 1 and Table 1.

Open in a separate window

Locomotor anatomy of the equine hind limb. (A) Lateral superficial and (B) lateral deep views. *Gracilis and sartorius are transparent so that deeper structures can be seen. Figure taken directly from Payne et al. (2005), by permission.

Table 1

Origin, insertion and action of muscles of the equine hind limb

MuscleOriginInsertionAction
Gluteus mediusGluteal fascia, sacrum and sacro-iliac ligamentGreater trochanter of femurExtension and abduction of hip
Biceps femoris
 Vertebral headSpinous and transverse processes of last three sacral vertebrae, caudal fascia, broad pelvic ligament, ischiadic tuberBlend with femoral and crural fascia and insert onto fascia onto patella ligament, patella, tibial crest and lastly onto calcaneal tuber via calcaneal tendonExtension and abduction of hip during stance, flexion of stifle and extension of hock during swing
 Intermediate headIschial tuber and ischiumAs aboveAs above
 Caudal headAs aboveAs aboveAs above
Semitendinosus
 Vertebral headLast spinous and transverse processes of sacrum, caudal fascia, first 3–4 caudal vertebrae and broad pelvic ligamentMedial tibial crest with aponeurosis of gracilis and sartorius and calcaneal tuber via calcaneal tendon which unites with that of biceps femoris to become accessory tendonExtension of hip during stance, flexion of stifle and extension of hock during swing
 Pelvic headIschial tuberAs aboveAs above
Vastus lateralisCraniolateral femoral shaftMiddle patella ligament to tibial tuberosity and tibial crestExtension of stifle
Gastrocnemius
 LateralisDistal femoral shaftVia common calcaneal tendon onto tuber calcaneiExtension of hock and flexion of stifle
Gastrocnemius
 MedialisAs aboveAs aboveAs above
Tibialis cranialisShaft, lateral condyle and crest of tibia, proximal fibulaMedial and intermediate cuneiforms and metatarsal IIIFlexion of hock
Extensor Digitorum longusExtensor fossa of femurExtensor process of distal phalanxExtension of digits and flexion of hock

Open in a separate window

Primary action of each joint is listed first, followed by secondary/auxillary actions (Nickel et al. 1986). The hamstring muscles flex the stifle during swing but constrain extension during the first half of stance due to the antagonistic action of rectus femoris and the cranial position of the vertical ground reaction force vector (Clayton et al. 2001).

The role of an individual muscle during locomotion is influenced by several features: muscle architecture; fibre type; moment-generating capacity (muscle force multiplied by moment arm) (); and activity patterns. In this study we focus on breed differences in muscle mass and architecture in the equine hind limb; future studies will address differences in fibre type and moment arms.

Muscle architecture (the arrangement of the muscle fibres within the muscle, relative to the axis of muscle force generation) is often described in terms of the following five parameters: muscle belly and tendon length; muscle fascicle length; muscle fascicle pennation angle; and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) (Zajac, 1992). Physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) is defined as the sum of the cross-sectional area of the muscle fibres within the muscle belly. It can be estimated using the following equation:

Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab (3)

where muscle density is taken as 1.06 g cm−3 (Mendez, 1960).

PCSA is related to the muscle's maximum isometric force potential (Fmax) (Powell et al. 1984), because Fmax is a product of PCSA and the maximum isometric stress of vertebrate skeletal muscle. However, owing to pennation of the fascicles, only a proportion of the fascicle force acts in the direction of the muscle belly and tendon. Thus Fmaxis estimated by:

Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab (4)

where the maximum isometric stress of vertebrate skeletal muscle is assumed to be 0.3 MPa (Wells, 1965; Woledge et al. 1985; Zajac, 1989; Medler, 2002), and θ is the pennation angle of the muscle fascicles.

Fascicle length (which is indicative of the number of sarcomeres arranged in series within the fascicle) relates to the range of motion over which a muscle can exert its force and its velocity of contraction (Gordon et al. 1966; Wickiewicz et al. 1984).

Muscle architecture has been shown to vary between muscles within the same individual (Brown et al. 2003; Payne et al. 2005), and between the same muscle in different individuals (Abe et al. 2000; Blazevich et al. 2006). Exercise (Blazevich et al. 2003) and genetic make-up, in terms of gender (Abe et al. 1998) are known to influence muscle architecture, but the extent to which differences in training and genetic profile relate to athletic performance remains unclear.

When compared to elite distance runners, human elite sprint runners have been observed to have longer muscle fascicle lengths, arranged at lesser pennation angles in their leg muscles (Abe et al. 2000), which has been linked to running speed (Kumagai et al. 2000).

Research into the effect of differences in muscle architecture and performance in the horse is sparse; instead researchers have tended to focus on the effects of different muscle fibre types (; Rivero et al. 2001) and metabolic influences such as the maximum capacity for oxygen consumption by the body during maximum exertion (VO2max) (Langsetmo et al. 1997; Prince et al. 2002). This paper attempts to address this gap in the literature by comparing the hind limb muscle architecture in two breeds of horse – the Quarter Horse, which has been selectively bred for sprinting, and the Arab, which has been selectively bred for endurance – to see whether differences in breed athleticism are reflected in differences in muscle architecture. Whilst all animals were being regularly exercised, none was being trained for either sprint or endurance activities; as such it is expected that any observed differences in muscle architecture will be as a result of breed differences rather than training effect.

It was hypothesized that, when comparing horses of similar height and body mass, the Quarter Horse hind limb muscles would, firstly, have a greater mass and, secondly, have longer fascicle lengths with lesser pennation angles when compared to the same muscles in the Arab.

Materials and methods

Horses

The study was conducted at the University of Queensland and approved by the University's Animal Ethics Committee. Twelve adult horses (minimum age 3.5 years) were euthanased for reasons unrelated to musculoskeletal disease (Table 2): six Quarter Horses, consisting of four geldings and two mares (13 ± 8 years); and six Arab horses, consisting of five geldings and one mare (13 ± 7 years). All horses had previously been in light ridden work.

Table 2

Subjects

Age (years)SexMass (kg)Height (m)Femur Length (cm)Tibia Length (cm)MT3 Length (cm)Breed
Limb 120Gelding*1.5146.038.544.5Quarter Horse
Limb 212Mare*1.4945.040.047.0Quarter Horse
Limb 314Gelding5041.5146.041.045.5Quarter Horse
Limb 425Mare4611.5244.037.042.5Quarter Horse
Limb 53.5Gelding4451.4945.040.044.0Quarter Horse
Limb 64.5Gelding4191.4844.038.543.0Quarter Horse
Limb 74Gelding*1.5044.037.545.0Arab
Limb 88Gelding*1.4643.036.545.0Arab
Limb 920Mare3881.4145.037.042.5Arab
Limb 1020Gelding3701.4441.533.541.5Arab
Limb 1120Gelding3271.4844.037.043.0Arab
Limb 1220Gelding4481.5144.537.546.0Arab
Mean QH134571.5045.039.044.4
Mean Arab153831.4744.036.543.8

Open in a separate window

MT3 = third metatarsal bone

*It was not possible to determine the mass of these animals because scales were not available prior to euthanasia.

The height (m) of each animal was determined by the use of a tape measure, measuring from the ground up to the highest point of the withers whilst the horse was standing square, sedated in stocks. All of the subjects were unshod. The mass (kg) of each subject was determined when feasible by standing the animal on an electronic weigh scale (‘Tru Test Easy Weigh II’ Sunbeam, Sydney, Australia). Limb length was determined by measuring and combining femur, tibia and the third metatarsal bone (MT3) length once the muscles had been removed. Bone lengths were measured using standard anatomical landmarks. Femur length was measured from the most proximal part of the greater trochanter to the most distal point on the lateral femoral condyle; tibia length was measured from the inter-condylar eminence to the most distal point on the medial malleolus; and MT3 length was measured from the most proximal lateral part of the head to the most distal part of the lateral condyle. It was not possible to measure the bone lengths of the individual phalanges as these distal bones were used in a separate study and hence were not available.

Muscle architecture

Immediately following euthanasia the hind limb was skinned and the overlying fascia was removed to expose the superficial muscles. The superficial gluteal and tensor fascia lata muscles were dissected away from their fascial and bony attachments to expose gluteus medius. The following muscles, together with their tendons, were identified and removed for further analysis: gluteus medius; biceps femoris; semitendinosus; vastus lateralis; gastrocnemius; extensor digitorum longus; and tibialis cranialis. The three heads of biceps femoris and the two heads of gastrocnemius were separated from each other by carefully dividing adjoining fascia.

Muscle belly length (mm) was determined by measuring the distance from the origin of the most proximal muscle fibres to the insertion of the most distal fibres with a flexible tape measure. Muscle mass (g) to the nearest 0.1 g was recorded using electronic scales (EKS, Hereford, UK) and reported to the nearest gram. Muscles over 2000 g were weighed in several pieces.

A minimum of three (central, medial and lateral) full thickness cuts were made in the muscle belly, in a plane following the direction of the muscle fascicles. Five measurements of fascicle length were obtained from each section, at varying depths, by laying a flexible measuring tape along the length of each fascicle. Five resting fascicle pennation angles (; Payne et al. 2005) were determined by measuring the angles between the muscle fascicle and internal tendon and/or aponeurosis using a clear plastic protractor (see plate 1). Multiple measurements within the same muscle and, where appropriate, within muscle compartments, were averaged. If resting pennation angles were less than 5°, they were given a value of zero and were not considered in calculations of Fmax.

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney U-test, at a significance level of P < 0.05, was used to compare the height, body mass, hind limb bone length, individual muscle mass and muscle belly lengths between the two subject groups. A two-way hierarchical anova at a significance level of P < 0.05 was used to determine whether statistical differences in fascicle length and pennation angles were present between the two subject groups. Data were tabulated using MicrosoftOfficeExcel 2003 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Height and body mass

It was not possible to detect a statistical difference in the height (m) (P = 0.09, n = 12) or body mass (kg) (P = 0.33, n = 8) between the two groups (Table 2).

Hind limb bone length

No statistical difference was detected in femoral (P = 0.07, n = 12) or third metatarsal bone lengths (P = 0.62, n = 12), but tibial bone length was slightly greater in the Quarter Horse group (P = 0.015, n = 12) (Table 2).

Muscle mass

The Quarter Horses exhibited larger muscle masses (Table 3), and hence muscle volumes, in both the proximal and distal muscles (P ≤ 0.01, n = 12). Gluteus medius, which had the largest mass in both breeds, represented 2.0% of body mass in the Quarter Horse and 1.7% in the Arab. Gastrocnemius had the largest mass of the distal leg muscles, the lateral head having a greater mass than the medial. Tibialis cranialis, with the smallest muscle mass, represented 0.08% and 0.05% body mass in the Quarter Horse and Arab respectively.

Table 3

Muscle data. The mean ± standard deviation of muscle mass (g), belly length (mm), fascicle length (mm) and pennation angles (°) of individual muscles in the Quarter Horse (n = 6) and Arab (n = 6) hind limb

Muscle mass (g)Muscle belly length (mm)Fascicle length (mm)Pennation Angle (°)
MuscleQHArabQHArabQHArabQHArab
Gluteus Medius*10010 ± 5596789 ± 772*577 ± 50540 ± 32155 ± 15140 ± 2344 ± 346 ± 5
Biceps femoris (vertebral head)*6557 ± 7504715 ± 646*684 ± 33618 ± 42191 ± 20183 ± 2352 ± 352 ± 9
Biceps femoris (intermediate head)*702 ± 81571 ± 132296 ± 26267 ± 37188 ± 17152 ± 19≤ 5≤ 5
Biceps femoris (caudal head)*1178 ± 358618 ± 284343 ± 46316 ± 46189 ± 20199 ± 47≤ 5≤ 5
Semitendinosus (vertebral & pelvic head)*4360 ± 11962426 ± 279жжжж≤ 5≤ 5
Semitendinosus vertebral headжж*709 ± 36624 ± 49143 ± 9137 ± 1939 ± 523 ± 20
Semitendinosus pelvic headжж*408 ± 22358 ± 38149 ± 28153 ± 11≤ 5≤ 5
Vastus lateralis*2134 ± 3111559 ± 209303 ± 24303 ± 24117 ± 19104 ± 1251 ± 641 ± 7
Gastrocnemius (lateralis & medialis)*1673 ± 1291179 ± 108жж42 ± 338 ± 6
Gastrocnemius lateralis*962 ± 86684 ± 83267 ± 8282 ± 8336 ± 433 ± 648 ± 444 ± 3
Gastrocnemius medialis*711 ± 47495 ± 32249 ± 17272 ± 8347 ± 444 ± 746 ± 346 ± 3
Extensor digitorum longus*431 ± 70310 ± 28*252 ± 19231 ± 1451 ± 554 ± 1336 ± 635 ± 5
Tibialis cranialis (proximal & distal)*353 ± 30262 ± 41320 ± 22318 ± 1368 ± 770 ± 5
Tibialis cranialis (proximal compartment)жжжж117 ± 14126 ± 9≤ 5≤ 5
Tibialis cranialis (distal compartment)жжжж20 ± 515 ± 244 ± 949 ± 4

Open in a separate window

QH = Quarter Horse

*A significant difference (P < 0.05) in value between the two breeds; ≤ 5 = pennation angles of 5º or less

ж = value not reported as data are presented for the entire muscle or for separate compartments/heads.

Muscle belly length

The muscle belly lengths of gluteus medius, semitendinosus (vertebral and pelvic heads), biceps femoris (vertebral head), and extensor digitorum longus muscles were statistically longer (P < 0.05, n = 12) in the Quarter Horse group (Table 3).

Fascicle length

No statistical difference (P = 0.20, n = 12) in fascicle length was observed when comparing the same muscle in either breed of horse (Table 3). The proximal muscles in both groups, with the exception of the proximal part of tibialis cranialis, had longer fascicle lengths than distal leg muscles.

Regional differences were observed in fascicle length within individual muscle bellies. Specifically, the medial head of gastrocnemius had longer fascicle lengths than the lateral head, and the proximal part of tibialis cranialis had longer fascicle lengths when compared to the distal part.

Pennation angle

There was no significant difference (P = 0.61, n = 12) in the fascicle pennation angles when comparing the same muscle in either breed (Table 3).

Biceps femoris could be divided into three distinct compartments, named according to their anatomical positioning: the vertebral, intermediate and caudal heads (Payne et al. 2005).

In both breeds, the muscle fascicles were parallel in the middle and caudal heads and had a similar pennation angle in the vertebral heads. Similarly, semitendinosus could be divided into two distinct sections: the pelvic head, which consisted of parallel muscle fascicles (with a pennation angle of less than 5°); and a pennate vertebral head. Tibialis cranialis was composed of parallel fascicles proximally and pennate fascicles in the distal section. There was no statistical difference in the pennation angles of gastrocnemius medialis or lateralis in either breed or between the two breeds.

Estimated parameters

PCSA and isometric force potential

All the Quarter Horse muscles had larger PCSAs and hence greater isometric force potential (Fmax) (Table 4). Gluteus medius had the largest PCSA and force potential in both groups. PCSA and isometric force potential (Fmax) decreased in magnitude as follows: biceps femoris; semitendinosus; gastrocnemius; vastus lateralis; extensor digitorum longus; tibialis cranialis. The mean PCSA of semitendinosus in the Quarter Horse was approximately double that of the Arab.

Table 4

Estimates of volume (cm3), physiological cross-sectional area (cm2) and maximum isometric force (N), of named hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse (n = 6) and Arab (n = 6). Note: Semitendinosus pelvic head, and the intermediate and caudal heads of biceps femoris had relatively short muscle fascicles (which were arranged both in series and in parallel to each other), relative to muscle belly length. The estimated values of Fmax given are therefore an overestimation of between 200 and 300% of the actual maximum isometric force potential of the muscles.

Volume (cm3)PCSA (cm2)Force (N)
MuscleQHArabQHArabQHArab
Gluteus medius94436405609457131529531
Biceps femoris (vertebral head)6186444932424359784493
Biceps femoris (intermediate head)663539353510601065
Biceps femoris (caudal head)111158359291759877
Semitendinosus (vertebral & pelvic head)4114228928215879504636
Vastus lateralis2013147117214132523201
Gastrocnemius lateralis90764525019750094250
Gastrocnemius medialis67146714110629442208
Extensor digitorum longus406292795419181333
Tibialis cranialis33324749351357960

Open in a separate window

QH = Quarter Horse.

Discussion

The mass and architecture of selected hind limb muscles of the Quarter Horse and Arab were investigated via cadaveric dissection. This study found that the hind limb muscles of the Quarter Horses had a greater muscle mass and PCSA when compared to the Arabs, which were of a similar height and body mass overall. Based on these findings, calculations of Fmax confirmed that the hind limb muscles of the Quarter Horse had the capacity to generate higher isometric forces than those of the Arab. This was primarily due to their larger volumes, rather than differences in muscle fascicle length or pennation angle.

Proximal-to-distal muscle architecture

The proximal muscles in both breeds of horse had larger volumes (Table 4) and fascicle lengths when compared to the more distal pennate muscles (with the exception of the proximal part of tibialis cranialis muscle). These findings are in agreement with previous studies of equine hind limb muscles (Payne et al. 2005).

Muscle mass

In this study, the Quarter Horse hind limb muscles contributed a higher percentage to total body mass when compared to those of the Arab, but the relatively small sample (n = 4) makes it difficult to draw any firm conclusions. However, a similar study by Gunn (1987) found the hind limb muscle mass to body mass ratio to be greater in thoroughbred horses trained for sprinting when compared to hurdling, suggesting this attribute may well be related to the ability to accelerate rapidly.

Muscle belly length

The Quarter Horse hip extensor (gluteus medius, semitendinosus and the vertebral head of biceps femoris) and extensor digitorum longus muscles had significantly longer muscle bellies when compared to the same muscles in the Arab (Table 3). This may be owing to the fact that the Quarter Horse group had slightly longer limb lengths (afforded by a longer tibia), although the remaining muscles in both groups were of a similar belly length. It may alternatively/additionally be due to conformational differences between the breeds: for example, differences in muscle–tendon length (which were not determined), or differences in muscle moment arms (which will be the subject of a future study). It is suggested that the longer muscle belly lengths of the Quarter Horse hind limb retractors may be a reflection of the breed's ability to accelerate rapidly, as the longer muscle belly lengths enable the muscles to generate force throughout a greater range of motion than those of the Arab, facilitating increased stride length (i.e. speed = stride length × stride frequency).

Fascicle length/pennation angle

As it was not possible to detect a significant difference between the two breeds of horse in muscle fascicle length or pennation angle in either the proximal or distal leg muscles, we rejected the hypothesis that the Quarter Horse hind limb muscles would be composed of longer fascicle lengths with lesser pennation angles when compared to the same muscles in the Arab. This hypothesis was proposed based on the fact that longer muscle fascicle lengths (associated with a greater velocity of contraction), arranged at lesser pennation angles, have been observed in the calf muscles of human elite sprint runners when compared to elite distance runners (Abe et al. 2000) and that fascicle length appears to be linked to running speed (Kumagai et al. 2000). Our study, however, suggests that the observed differences in muscle fascicle length and pennation angle in the leg muscles of human elite sprint and endurance runners may have occurred as an adaptive response to a specific training programme, in the same way that muscle mass increases in response to resistance training (Kearns et al. 2000) and pennation angle and PCSA increases in human weight lifters (Aagaard et al. 2001).

Pennation of the muscle fascicles influences the amount of force that is transmitted through the attaching tendon (Zajac, 1992). Greater pennation angles result in a significant force reduction, whilst smaller pennation angles have minimal effect [because in muscles with pennation angles of 20° and below, cos(θ) is close to 1.0]. Although increased pennation decreases force due to the direction of the force application, it also allows muscles to have a larger PCSA for a given volume and therefore results in an increased capacity of the muscle to exert force. In this study, the intermediate and caudal heads of biceps femoris, the pelvic head of semitendinosus, and the proximal part of tibialis cranialis had muscle fascicle pennation angles of less than 5°. The remainder of the muscles were pennate and many exhibited pennation angles in excess of 40°. The pennation angles of all the muscles, in both breeds, are greater than those recorded in the Thoroughbred by (Payne et al. 2005). These differences may be breed-dependent, or because of differences in sampling technique: for example, a different location/compartment within the muscle may have been sampled in the two studies. This is especially relevant considering that pennation angle can vary dramatically throughout the same muscle, a feature particularly evident in the tibialis cranialis muscle. This variation in pennation angle coupled with differences in fascicle length suggests that functional specialization exists within the same muscle, a finding that has been mirrored by other researchers investigating human muscle architecture (Aagaard et al. 2001; Blazevich et al. 2006). More detailed studies of individual muscles would provide important information on muscle morphological compartmentalization and hence functional compartmentalization.

It is possible that differences in study design make it inappropriate to compare the findings of our research to published human studies which have determined differences in muscle architecture in vivo using B-mode ultrasound (Kumagai et al. 2000; Kearns et al. 2000; Blazevich et al. 2006). Undoubtedly, ultrasound allows the dynamics of muscle architecture to be examined in vivo, enabling the recordings of fascicle lengths and pennation angles at specific muscle lengths (joint angles) and levels of muscle tension (Narici et al. 1996; ); however, it is constrained to providing information on superficial musculature only and hence would not have been a viable method of obtaining architectural data in this study. We determined fascicle length and pennation angle after the muscles had been removed from the limb. It is possible that subsequent changes in fascicle length occurred, especially following rigor mortis and potential dehydration of any of the muscles, which can result in tissue shrinkage (Cutts et al. 1991). However, as all muscles in this study were examined and compared within 48 h of euthanasia, under the same conditions, breed differences in resting fascicle length and pennation angle should not have been affected. It is appreciated that under ideal circ*mstances muscle fascicle length should have been normalized to sarcomere ‘resting’ length, but this was not possible in this study.

Calculated parameters

Estimates of maximum isometric force potential

The proximal limb muscles in both breeds of horse tended to have the greater isometric force potential (Fmax) than the distal leg muscles; these findings are in agreement with those of Payne et al. (2005).

All the Quarter Horse muscles had the ability to generate greater isometric forces when compared to the same muscles in the Arab. This was owing to differences in muscle mass rather than differences in muscle fascicle length or pennation angle (Table 3). The Quarter Horse semitendinosus muscle had almost double the physiological cross-sectional area when compared to that of the Arab, which resulted in the Quarter Horse group having a much greater isometric force potential. Studies comparing cross-sectional area of semitendinosus in Thoroughbred horses (selectively bred for racing) and other breeds of horse have similarly found it to be greater in the Thoroughbred (Gunn, 1979), which suggests it is an important hind limb retractor, capable of generating large forces required for acceleration.

Semitendinosus pelvic head, and the intermediate and caudal heads of biceps femoris had relatively short muscle fascicles (which were arranged both in series and in parallel to each other), relative to muscle belly length. The estimated values of Fmaxgiven in Table 4 are therefore an overestimation of 200–300% of the actual maximum isometric force potential of the muscles. There is not a simple way of compensating for this effect, although an alternative method of calculating Fmax when muscle fascicles are arranged in series, may be to use the following equation:

Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab (5)

However, the methodology used in this paper permits comparison with previously published data and does not affect the comparisons made between muscles in the two breeds of horse studied.

Conclusion

The hind limb muscles of the Quarter Horse were of a significantly greater mass, but had similar fascicle lengths and pennation angles when compared to those of the Arab. This resulted in the Quarter Horse hind limb muscles having greater physiological cross-sectional areas and greater isometric force potential. As both groups of animals were undertaking similar exercise regimes, this study suggests that the Quarter Horse as a breed inherently possesses large strong hind limb muscles with the potential to accelerate its body mass more rapidly than those of the Arab. It is hoped that this study will complement future studies of muscle architecture in elite Quarter Horse sprinters and elite Arab endurance horses and will help to differentiate further between the effects of training and genetic predisposition.

References

  • AQHA. A Long Goodbye. Sunland, NM: MBNA America New Mexico Challenge (G1); 2005. http://racing.aqha.com/racing. [Google Scholar]
  • UAE Equestrian & Racing Federation. Xandu Haji Buba. Euston Park, UK: 2006. CEI * 160 km, F:\UAE EQUESTRIAN & RACING FEDERATION.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Leffers AM, Wagner A, Magnusson SP, et al. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol. 2001;534:613–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abe T, Brechue WF, Fujita S, Brown JB. Gender differences in FFM accumulation and architectural characteristics of muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:1066–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abe T, Kumagai K, Brechue WF. Fascicle length of leg muscles is greater in sprinters than distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1125–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Biewener AA, Roberts TJ. Muscle and tendon contributions to force, work, and elastic energy savings: a comparative perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000;28:99–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Bronks R, Newton RU. Training-specific muscle architecture adaptation after 5-wk training in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:2013–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Zhou S. Intra- and intermuscular variation in human quadriceps femoris architecture assessed in vivo. J Anat. 2006;209:289–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown NA, Kawcak CE, Mcilwraith CW, Pandy MG. Architectural properties of distal forelimb muscles in horses, Equus caballus. J Morphol. 2003;258:106–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clayton HM, Hoyt DF, Wickler SJ, Cogger EA, Lanovaz JL. Hindlimb net joint energies during swing phase as a function of trotting velocity. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2002:363–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cutts A, Alexander RM, Ker RF. Ratios of cross-sectional areas of muscles and their tendons in a healthy human forearm. J Anat. 1991;176:133–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dimery NJ, Alexander RM, Ker RF. Elastic extension of leg tendons in the locomotion of horses (Equus caballus) J Zool. 1986;210:415–425. [Google Scholar]
  • Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Clayton HM, Cogger EA, Wickler SJ. Moments and power generated by the horse (Equus caballus) hind limb during jumping. J Exp Biol. 2004a;207:667–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Wickler SJ. Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds. J Exp Biol. 2004b;207:3507–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gans C, de Vree F. Functional bases of fiber length and angulation in muscle. J Morphol. 1987;192:63–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon AM, Huxley AF, Julian FJ. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966;184:170–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gunn HM. Total fibre numbers in cross sections of the semitendinosus in athletic and non-athletic horses and dogs. J Anat. 1979;128:821–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gunn HM. Muscle, bone and fat proportions and muscle distribution of Thoroughbreds and other horses. Equine exercise physiology. 1987;2 [Google Scholar]
  • Kearns CF, Abe T, Brechue WF. Muscle enlargement in sumo wrestlers includes increased muscle fascicle length. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;83:289–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumagai K, Abe T, Brechue WF, Ryushi T, Takano S, Mizuno M. Sprint performance is related to muscle fascicle length in male 100-m sprinters. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88:811–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Langsetmo I, Weigle GE, Fedde MR, Erickson HH, Barstow TJ, Poole DC. VO2 kinetics in the horse during moderate and heavy exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83:1235–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maganaris CN, Paul JP. Hysteresis measurements in intact human tendon. J Biomech. 2000;33:1723–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mcguigan MP, Wilson AM. The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus caballus. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:1325–1336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Medler S. Comparative trends in shortening velocity and force production in skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002;283:R368–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mendez J, Keys A. Density and composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism. 1960;9:184–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC, van Osch GJ, van den Bogert AJ. Ground reaction force patterns of Dutch warmblood horses at normal trot. Equine Vet J. 1993;25:134–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Narici MV, Binzoni T, Hiltbrand E, Fasel J, Terrier F, Cerretelli P. In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. J Physiol. 1996;496(Pt 1):287–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM. The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion. J Anat. 2004;205:479–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Payne RC, Hutchinson JR, Robilliard JJ, Smith NC, Wilson AM. Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus) J Anat. 2005;206:557–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Powell PL, Roy RR, Kanim P, Bello MA, Edgerton VR. Predictability of skeletal-muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea-pig hindlimbs. J Appl Physiol. 1984;57:1715–1721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Prince A, Geor R, Harris P, Hoekstra K, Gardner S, Hudson C, et al. Comparison of the metabolic responses of trained Arabians and Thoroughbreds during high-and low-intensity exercise. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2002:95–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rivero JL, Henckel P. Muscle biopsy index for discriminating between endurance horses with different performance records. Res Vet Sci. 1996;61:49–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rivero JL, Serrano AL, Quiroz-Rothe E, Aguilera-Tejero E. Coordinated changes of kinematics and muscle fibre properties with prolonged endurance training. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2001:104–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Robert C, Valette JP, Denoix JM. The effects of treadmill inclination and speed on the activity of two hindlimb muscles in the trotting horse. Equine Vet J. 2000;32:312–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wells JB. Comparison of mechanical properties between slow and fast mammalian muscles. J Physiol. 1965;178:252–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Perrine JJ, Edgerton VR. Muscle architecture and force-velocity relationships in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1984;57:435–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Witte TH, Knill K, Wilson AM. Determination of peak vertical ground reaction force from duty factor in the horse (Equus caballus) J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3639–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Woledge RC, Curtin NA, Homsher E. Energetic Aspects of Muscle Contraction. London: Academic Press; 1985. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zajac FE. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17:359–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zajac FE. How musculotendon architecture and joint geometry affect the capacity of muscles to move and exert force on objects: a review with application to arm and forearm tendon transfer design. J Hand Surg [Am] 1992;17:799–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Duncan Muller

Last Updated:

Views: 5657

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (79 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Duncan Muller

Birthday: 1997-01-13

Address: Apt. 505 914 Phillip Crossroad, O'Konborough, NV 62411

Phone: +8555305800947

Job: Construction Agent

Hobby: Shopping, Table tennis, Snowboarding, Rafting, Motor sports, Homebrewing, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Duncan Muller, I am a enchanting, good, gentle, modern, tasty, nice, elegant person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.